1/10/2024 0 Comments Florida waterdo![]() If you're concerned, the EPA recommends contacting your state environmental protection agency or health department and your local water utility to find out what actions they suggest. Then you can compare those numbers to your state's standards for safe levels of PFAS in drinking water (or those in the EPA advisories). The EPA recommends finding out whether PFAS chemicals are in your drinking water, either by calling your local water utility or conducting regular well testing, depending on your source. "If the average American is worried about the quality of their drinking water, they can use this and other studies to get informed, evaluate their own risk and reach out to their local health officials about testing or treatment," she added. Smalling says that USGS tap water research is continuing, with an emphasis on private well users and rural communities. The study says its findings support the need for further assessments of the health risks of PFAS both as a class and in combination with other contaminants, "particularly in unmonitored private-wells where information is limited or not available." "Results from this study indicate potential hotspots include the Great Plains, Great Lakes, Eastern Seaboard, and Central/Southern California regions," Smalling said. And the study suggests that exposure may be more common in certain geographical regions. USGS scientists estimate there's a 75% chance that PFAS will be found in urban areas and a 25% chance in rural areas. Smalling said they observed the chemicals more frequently in samples collected near urban areas and potential PFAS sources like airports and wastewater treatment plants, which is in line with previous research. The researchers found that PFAS concentrations were similar between the two. Of those, 447 rely on public supplies and 269 on private wells. "The USGS study specifically focused on collecting water directly from a homeowners tap where exposure actually occurs," she explained.īetween 20, scientists collected samples from 716 residences, businesses and drinking-water treatment plants from a range of protected, rural and urban areas across the U.S. Most state and federal monitoring programs typically measure exposure to PFAS and other pollutants at the water treatment plants or groundwater wells that supply them, Smalling said. It also has implications for the general population. While the USGS - which describes itself as an unbiased and impartial science organization - doesn't offer policy recommendations in its report, Smalling points to several key takeaways.įor one, she said, it highlights the importance of collecting PFAS data from private wells, which are monitored at homeowners' discretion and not regulated by the EPA the way that public sources are. USGS tested for 32 individual PFAS compounds, and said in a release that the EPA's recent advisories for PFOS and PFOA "were exceeded in every sample in which they were detected in this study." Environmental Protection Agency issued drinking water health advisories for two of the most prevalent compounds - PFOA and PFOS - in June 2022, warning that they pose health risks even at levels so low that the government can't detect them. It involved testing water samples from more than 700 locations across the country during a five-year period, and using that data to model and estimate PFAS contamination nationwide.Īnd it comes as the federal government is looking to create new regulations for toxins in drinking water. USGS This USGS map shows the number of PFAS detected in tap water samples from select sites across the nation. This study is the first to compare PFAS in tap water from both public and private supplies on a broad scale throughout the country, Smalling said. "This USGS study can help members of the public to understand their risk of exposure and inform policy and management decisions regarding testing and treatment options for drinking water," Kelly Smalling, a USGS research chemist who is the lead author of the new study released Wednesday, told NPR over email. Research has linked exposure to certain PFAS to adverse health effects in humans, from an increased risk of certain cancers, increased obesity and high cholesterol risk, decreased fertility and developmental effects like low birth weight in children. They break down very slowly, building up in people, animals and the environment over time. ![]() The man-made chemicals - of which there are thousands - are found in all sorts of places, from nonstick cookware to stain-resistant carpets to contaminated sources of food and water. ![]() At least 45% of the nation's tap water could be contaminated with at least one form of PFAS known as "forever chemicals," according to a newly released study by the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |